Skip to main content
Glama

Check Withdraw Ready

check_withdraw_ready
Read-onlyIdempotent

Verify Solana stake account withdrawal readiness. Returns per-account withdrawable epoch, estimated seconds until ready, and plain-English status. Use instead of polling check_stake_accounts.

Instructions

Check whether stake accounts are ready to withdraw. Returns per-account readiness with withdrawable epoch, estimated seconds remaining, and plain-English state description. Use this instead of polling check_stake_accounts.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
walletAddressYesWallet address to check
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, and open-world behavior. The description adds value by detailing the return information (readiness, epoch, seconds, state description), which goes beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no extraneous information. The purpose is front-loaded, and every sentence contributes meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is complete: it explains the purpose, return values, and usage context. Annotations further supplement behavioral info.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for the single parameter 'walletAddress'. The description does not add extra semantics, but the schema is sufficient; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it checks whether stake accounts are ready to withdraw, specifies returned fields (withdrawable epoch, estimated seconds, state description), and distinguishes from the sibling 'check_stake_accounts' by suggesting use instead of polling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly advises using this tool instead of polling 'check_stake_accounts', providing clear context. However, it does not mention when not to use it or alternative scenarios outside that sibling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/blueprint-infrastructure/solentic-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server