Skip to main content
Glama
blueprint-infrastructure

Solentic

by blueprint-infrastructure
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Solentic

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • everstake-mcp by everstake

      everstake-mcpofficial

      everstake
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Everstake's non-custodial staking data across 130+ networks: live APY, uptime metrics, rewards calculator, integrations, security and compliance. Built for asset managers, custodians, and exchanges evaluating institutional staking.
      11
      1
      BSD 3-Clause

    • StatePulse API

      Ahmed-Achtatar
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      55+ pay-per-call tools for AI agents over MCP: live telemetry, blockchain/on-chain checks, environmental, transit, finance, and network utilities. No API key or signup — agents pay per request with x402 USDC micropayments (Base and Solana).
      MIT

    • solfleet

      sanjeevkkansal
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Agent-safe management of independent Solana validators and RPC nodes over MCP and CLI: Solana-aware status, in-place upgrades, and DNS failover. Every change is dry-run by default, policy-gated, and audited, and it never touches keypairs.
      15
      21 PyPI
      Apache 2.0

    • solana-mcp-server

      AiAgentKarl
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server giving AI agents access to Solana blockchain data. 7 tools: wallet balances, transaction history, token prices (Jupiter + CoinGecko), token metadata, DeFi yields (Raydium + Orca), and token safety checks (RugCheck scores, holder concentration, insider detection).
      8
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose: staking actions, status checks, verification, webhooks, and utilities are well-separated. Even advanced transaction builders are explicitly differentiated from one-shot tools, preventing agent misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 26 tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., get_performance_metrics, create_stake_transaction, list_webhooks). Even one-word verbs like stake and unstake are uniform, and the advanced variants (create_*, withdraw_stake) are coherent.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 26 tools, the server is slightly over the typical scope but each tool addresses a specific need across staking, verification, and monitoring. The breadth is justified for a full-featured staking service, though a few could be consolidated without loss.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the entire staking lifecycle (stake, activate, check, unstake, withdraw), plus validator info, performance, APY, webhooks, code verification, and wallet guidance. No obvious dead ends; advanced users have transaction-building alternatives and submission support.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources