remove_system
Deletes a specified system from the multi-board configuration to clean up the project.
Instructions
Remove a system from the configuration
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | System identifier to remove |
Deletes a specified system from the multi-board configuration to clean up the project.
Remove a system from the configuration
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | System identifier to remove |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It only states 'remove' without detailing side effects, reversibility, or dependencies. For a destructive operation, more context is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise and front-loaded with purpose. However, it lacks structure for additional critical details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, description fails to explain return value, error cases, or impact on configuration. Minimal completeness for a deletion tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'name' described as 'System identifier to remove'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states action ('Remove') and resource ('a system from the configuration'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'remove_board' or 'add_system'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like modifying configuration directly or using other removal tools. No prerequisites mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bleugreen/kicad-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server