lanhu-design-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to lanhu-design-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for reading and analyzing Lanhu (Blue Lake) design projects, providing tools to retrieve design lists, previews, node trees, schemas, and exportable resources.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal MCP server for Tencent CoDesign sharing links, exposing artboards, layer specs, preview images, and exported slices to support design-to-code workflows.863 npm14MIT
- FlicenseDqualityBmaintenanceAI-powered MCP server for analyzing UI designs and bug reports from Lanhu and Zentao platforms.2-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server that converts Lanhu project/design links into design context consumable by Codex or other AI agents.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for ingesting UI screenshots, Figma MCP node JSON, or hybrid Figma-plus-screenshot sources into a cross-platform design-to-code artifact pipeline.94 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server renders UI design artifacts headlessly, runs deterministic linters, and manages stateful design review loops with an independent vision critic.-
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: authentication (login, status, logout) and design operations (list, analyze, get assets, export context). There is no overlap, and descriptions clarify any potential confusion between get_design_assets and export_ui_context.
All tools follow a consistent 'lanhu_' prefix with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., lanhu_auth_login, lanhu_get_designs, lanhu_export_ui_context). The only deviation is lanhu_health_check, which is still a common compound noun and does not break consistency.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for its domain of authentication and design retrieval/analysis. Each tool serves a necessary function without redundancy, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range.
The tool surface covers authentication, health, listing, analysis, and asset retrieval. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated 'get_design' tool for basic design details without analysis, but the list and analysis tools effectively cover this need.