ssh-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ssh-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to execute commands and transfer files on remote servers over SSH connections.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage remote servers via SSH, including command execution, multi-host batch operations, SFTP file transfer, background job handling, DevOps diagnostics, port tunneling, and safety guardrails like high-risk command blocking and read-only mode.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to securely execute remote SSH commands, perform file transfers, and monitor system status through a standardized interface. It features robust security controls including command whitelisting, blacklisting, and credential isolation to prevent unauthorized operations.108 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to securely execute commands, transfer files, and manage port forwarding on remote servers via SSH.122 npm37Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to securely connect to and manage remote servers via SSH, supporting command execution, file transfers via SFTP, and multi-server management with both password and SSH key authentication.937 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to execute SSH commands and transfer files to and from remote servers, supporting remote server management and seamless session transfer to a VPS.-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose: execute targets one host, execute_on_group targets a fleet, list_servers/list_groups cover inventory, and upload_file/download_file cover file transfer. The only superficially similar pair, execute and execute_on_group, is explicitly differentiated by scope and arguments.
Most tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_servers, upload_file, download_file), but execute is a bare verb and execute_on_group uses a prepositional modifier. The naming is still predictable and readable despite these minor deviations.
Six tools is well-scoped for an SSH MCP server: single-host execution, group execution, server/group discovery, and bidirectional file transfer. Nothing feels redundant or missing enough to warrant a lower score.
Core SSH workflows are covered: inventory, single-host and group command execution, and upload/download. The main gap is that there is no group-level file transfer counterpart to execute_on_group, but agents can work around it by looping over servers.