get_org_member_groups
Retrieve group IDs assigned to an organization member by providing the member's ID.
Instructions
Retrieve a member's group ids
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| memberId | Yes | ID of the member |
Retrieve group IDs assigned to an organization member by providing the member's ID.
Retrieve a member's group ids
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| memberId | Yes | ID of the member |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but only states the basic action. It does not disclose permissions, error behavior, or whether it returns only IDs or full group objects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff. However, it could be slightly expanded to include output format or usage context without harming conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with no output schema, the description is somewhat lacking. It does not specify the return format (e.g., array of strings) or handle potential errors, causing minor completeness gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for memberId. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond 'ID of the member', so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Retrieve' and the resource 'a member's group ids'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_org_member (member details) and get_org_group_members (members of a group).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_org_member or update_org_member_groups. The description lacks context such as prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bitwarden/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server