get_org_member
Retrieve details of a specific organization member using their member ID.
Instructions
Retrieve a member
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| memberId | Yes | ID of the member |
Retrieve details of a specific organization member using their member ID.
Retrieve a member
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| memberId | Yes | ID of the member |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations and description is minimal. Does not disclose behavior on missing member, permissions required, or return format. For a read tool, basic transparency is lacking.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise with one sentence, but at the cost of missing necessary information. It is not improperly verbose but lacks structure and completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With one parameter, no output schema, no annotations, and a terse description, the tool definition is incomplete. Does not clarify return value or edge cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter described as 'ID of the member'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Retrieve a member' states the action and resource but is overly generic. Among siblings like get_org_group, get_org_collection, it lacks differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_org_member_groups or other get tools. Context and prerequisites are missing.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bitwarden/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server