Adjust MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Adjust MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server for the Meta Marketing API. Gives Claude Desktop direct access to your ad account data — campaign performance, creative analysis, audience breakdowns, and budget pacing.10151 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that wraps Nightjar's analytics API, enabling Claude Code to query events, funnels, dashboards, and metrics through natural language.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server to manage Meta Ads (Facebook/Instagram) campaigns, ad sets, insights, and audiences from Claude Code using natural language.93 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Google Ads campaign reporting and management via Claude, enabling GAQL queries, performance metrics, and campaign modifications.20 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for managing and analyzing Meta Ads (Facebook/Instagram) with over 80 natural-language tools for AI agents like Claude Desktop.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Meta Marketing API to Claude, enabling analysis and management of Facebook/Instagram ad accounts, including campaigns, insights, and budget adjustments with safety confirmations.1,040 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have overlapping purposes related to Adjust reporting, which creates some ambiguity. 'adjust-reporting' is vague and could encompass standard reports, while 'adjust-standard-report' is more specific but may be a subset of the first tool. Descriptions help differentiate them, but the boundaries are not entirely clear.
Tool names follow a consistent pattern with 'adjust-' prefix and snake_case style, making them predictable and readable. There is a minor deviation in that one tool uses a hyphenated compound word ('reporting') while the other uses an underscore ('standard_report'), but overall the naming is mostly consistent.
With only 2 tools, the server feels too thin for a reporting domain, as it lacks basic operations like filtering, customization, or data export. This minimal set is insufficient for comprehensive reporting workflows, making it borderline inappropriate for the apparent scope.
The tool surface has significant gaps for a reporting server. It lacks essential operations such as creating custom reports, updating report parameters, deleting reports, or accessing detailed analytics beyond standard metrics. This incompleteness will likely cause agent failures in handling varied reporting tasks.