publish_landing_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It does state the main effect (making the page publicly accessible), but it does not mention whether the operation is reversible, any side effects, or validation requirements. There is no contradiction with annotations since none exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 11 words, front-loaded with the action and resource, and contains no filler. Every word contributes to the meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description sufficiently conveys the core purpose and outcome. It lacks context about prerequisites or error conditions, but for a simple publish operation it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents the required 'slug' parameter with 100% coverage. The description adds no additional meaning about the parameter, such as format or how to obtain it. Baseline 3 is appropriate given the schema fully covers the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Publish' with the resource 'landing page' and states the outcome 'making it publicly accessible at its URL'. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like edit_landing_page or generate_landing_page.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies that this tool is used when a landing page should be made publicly accessible, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives or provide exclusions. No mention of prerequisites like having an existing landing page or connected domain.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.