create_blog_author

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of disclosing behavior. It does reveal that the tool returns an authorId, which is useful, but it does not mention side effects, uniqueness constraints, permission requirements, or error conditions typical for a create operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences. The first sentence front-loads the core action, and the second adds the key return value and downstream usage. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create tool with comprehensive parameter schema coverage and no output schema, the description adequately covers the essential information: what it creates, what it returns, and how the return value integrates with sibling tools. No additional context seems necessary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully describes all four parameters (firstName, lastName, email, brandId) with individual descriptions, so coverage is 100%. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new author for blog articles' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from related tools like create_blog_category and list_blog_authors. It also mentions the return value, an authorId, which clarifies its purpose in the blog creation workflow.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when an author is needed for generate_blog_post or update_blog_article by noting the authorId is used there. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or mention alternatives for listing or managing authors, leaving the guidance mostly implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.