A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables LLM clients to interact with Azure cost analysis, budget tracking, forecasting, and resource optimization across multiple subscriptions.
MIT
Azure Cost Management MCP
by bigonil
Related Servers
Alternatives to Azure Cost Management MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceCloud cost management MCP server for Azure. Ask your AI about your cloud bill.1536 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural-language queries about Azure resource compliance, including VM compliance, patch status, orphaned RBAC, and infrastructure health, through read-only MCP tools.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAnalyzes Azure cloud costs, audits for waste, and provides budget insights via natural language through a secure local MCP server.27 PyPI2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to query and analyze AWS cloud costs, audit for waste, and monitor budgets through natural language in MCP-compatible AI assistants, while keeping AWS credentials local.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables natural-language querying and visualization of cloud spending and Bedrock model invocation usage through MCP clients, with breakdowns by service, day, region, instance type, user, and model, including optional cross-account access.-
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 9 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of cost management: querying, forecasting, dimensions, alerts, budget CRUD, and Advisor recommendations. The descriptions clarify boundaries between similar tools like alerts vs. budget list, preventing confusion.
Naming Consistency4/5
Names follow a consistent prefix pattern (azure_cost_, azure_budget_, azure_advisor_) with mostly verb-based actions (query, forecast, list, get, create, delete). However, 'azure_cost_dimensions' and 'azure_cost_alerts' use noun forms, which is a minor deviation from the verb_noun convention.
Tool Count5/5
Nine tools is well-scoped for an Azure cost management server. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy, covering the essential operations for cost analysis and budget management.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the core cost management lifecycle: querying, forecasting, alerts, budget CRUD, and recommendations. Minor gaps exist, such as lacking cost export functionality or direct alert configuration, but these are not critical for most workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues