MCP Server Example
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Server Example
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn educational implementation of a Model Context Protocol server that demonstrates how to build a functional MCP server for integrating with various LLM clients like Claude Desktop.1162MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA custom Model Context Protocol server that gives Claude Desktop and other LLMs access to file system operations and command execution capabilities through standardized tool interfaces.23Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges MCP clients with local LLM services, enabling seamless integration with MCP-compatible applications through standard tools like chat completion, model listing, and health checks.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server that standardizes tool discovery, execution, and context management for AI applications.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA secure, local communication runtime bridge that interfaces a cloud-based Large Language Model (Claude Desktop) with a local machine execution environment using the Model Context Protocol (MCP).Eclipse Public 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to connect to LLM/API services using the Model Context Protocol, providing real-time interaction and tool access. Also offers RESTful API endpoints via FastAPI for programmatic integration with existing systems.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only a single tool in the set, there is no possibility of confusing it with another tool. Its purpose (searching library documentation by query and library name) is clearly stated.
The lone name get_docs follows a clean verb_noun snake_case convention. No inconsistency is possible within a one-tool surface, though it's worth noting 'get' is slightly at odds with the described search behavior.
A single search tool is very thin for a docs-lookup server; agents have no way to list supported libraries or fetch a specific document. One tool earns its place but the surface feels under-scoped rather than well-scoped.
Only a query-based search exists, with no listing of available libraries, no fetch-by-id/page retrieval, and no error or fallback path. Notable gaps will force agents to rely on trial-and-error query strings to reach specific content.