Skip to main content
Glama
bhawnapannu2701

workbench-mcp

by bhawnapannu2701
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to workbench-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • safe-workspace-mcp

      Xs-trek
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A minimal, security-focused MCP server that provides structured read/write access to exactly one local workspace, with built-in local Git checkpoints and rollback.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • chatbottool-mcp

      tamvi-journal
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server providing guarded access to a workspace with file operations, search, commands, tests, Git helpers, checkpoints, and structured tool results. It supports multiple tool modes and emphasizes security with workspace restrictions and secret blocking.
      1
      MIT

    • my-pi

      BoxBoxmari
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP runtime for coding agents with bounded workspace access, content-preconditioned writes, AST search, LSP navigation and diagnostics, and Git status/diff. Designed to give coding agents useful repository access without treating unrestricted shell access as the default integration boundary.
      2
      13
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing files, reading a file, and returning workspace information. No ambiguity or overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_files, read_file, workspace_info), making them predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is minimal but reasonable for a focused workspace file server. The count feels slightly low but not problematic given the apparent scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The set covers listing and reading files but lacks write, delete, or directory operations, leaving significant gaps for typical file management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources