Skip to main content
Glama
bezata

kObsidian MCP

Analyze Note Tags

tags.analyze
Read-onlyIdempotent

Analyze a single note to retrieve its tags, separated into frontmatter, inline, and a combined list. Use this tool when you have one note and need its tag structure.

Instructions

Return the tags present in a single note, split into frontmatterTags, inlineTags, and their de-duplicated union allTags. Use this when you have one note and want to know what tags it carries — contrast with tags.search, which scans the whole vault for one specific tag. Read-only.

Operates on the session-active vault (see vault.current — selectable via vault.select) unless an explicit vaultPath argument is passed, which always wins.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesVault-relative note path to analyze.
vaultPathNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYes
frontmatterTagsYes
inlineTagsYes
allTagsYesUnion of frontmatter and inline tags, de-duplicated.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, not open world. Description adds value by detailing the split output structure and vaultPath precedence, without contradicting annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences that front-load the core purpose and immediately differentiate from sibling. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description sufficiently covers what the tool does, its inputs, and vault selection. Minor omission: no mention of error handling for non-existent notes, but overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50% (only 'path' described). Description provides limited extra meaning: vaultPath's precedence is noted, but neither parameter's format or constraints are elaborated beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'return' and clearly defines the resource: tags in a single note, split into three categories. It distinguishes from sibling tags.search, which scans the whole vault.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (single note analysis) and contrasts with tags.search. Also explains vault selection behavior, providing clear guidance on context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bezata/kObsidian'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server