Skip to main content
Glama
bezata

kObsidian MCP

Analyze Link Health

links.health
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get a dashboard summary of link health for your Obsidian vault, including total and broken link counts, orphan notes, link density, and top hub notes.

Instructions

Summarise link health for the whole vault: total link count, broken-link count and ratio, orphan-note count, average outbound/inbound link density, and a list of the top hub notes. Read-only. Use this as a dashboard check; call links.broken/links.orphaned/links.hubs for the full per-item lists.

Operates on the session-active vault (see vault.current — selectable via vault.select) unless an explicit vaultPath argument is passed, which always wins.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
vaultPathNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes as 'Read-only' and explains vault selection precedence (active vault vs vaultPath), adding behavioral context beyond annotations which already mark it as read-only and idempotent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences front-load the summary and usage, followed by a clear explanation of vault behavior. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description adequately covers what the tool returns and when to use alternatives, complemented by comprehensive annotations for safety profile.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter `vaultPath` has no schema description, but the description explains its behavior: 'unless an explicit vaultPath argument is passed, which always wins', adding crucial semantic meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Summarise link health for the whole vault' and lists specific metrics, differentiating it from sibling tools like `links.broken` and `links.orphaned` which provide per-item lists.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Use this as a dashboard check' and directs to sibling tools for detailed lists, providing clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bezata/kObsidian'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server