Skip to main content
Glama
bestpractical

mcp-server-rt

Official
by bestpractical
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-rt

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • rt-mcp

      ghidav
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Request Tracker REST2 API, enabling ticket, queue, user, and asset management via natural language.
      MIT
    • tickiti-mcp by tickiti

      tickiti-mcpofficial

      tickiti
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes the Tickiti helpdesk API to AI assistants, enabling ticket management and helpdesk operations via natural language.
      11
      MIT

    • i-net HelpDesk MCP Server

      roddyst
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes the i-net HelpDesk Ticket Web-API as tools for AI agents, enabling ticket search, reading, creation, and actions like replying, closing, and escalating, with attachment support.
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 43 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, and close pairs like list_group_members vs get_group and get_ticket_history vs get_transaction are explicitly differentiated in their descriptions. Even with 43 tools, the annotations make the intended selection clear without true overlap.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern such as get_, list_, create_, update_, add_, and remove_. Minor singular/plural inconsistencies like grant_rights vs revoke_right and add_group_members vs remove_group_member prevent a perfect score.

    Tool Count2/5

    43 tools is a very large surface for a single server, spanning tickets, queues, groups, lifecycles, rights, and custom fields. Even though each tool appears purposeful, the count is well beyond the typical well-scoped MCP toolset and creates significant selection burden for agents.

    Completeness3/5

    Ticket, queue, lifecycle, and rights workflows are covered thoroughly, including create/read/update operations. However, group and custom field management lack update/delete operations, and user management is limited to lookup and current-user, leaving notable gaps in the administrative lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources