Remove execution link

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not mention the destructive nature of the operation, the optionality of link_id, or the consequence that omitting link_id removes all links for the execution. These behaviors are only surfaced in the parameter descriptions, not in the main tool description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the verb and resource, making it easy to scan. All words earn their place, even though the description is minimal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple removal tool with no output schema, the description is somewhat under-specified. It does not explain the all-links removal behavior when execution_id is used without link_id, nor does it mention the irreversibility of the action. The lack of annotations makes the description responsible for providing this context, which it fails to do fully.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with both parameters described. The description adds no additional meaning beyond echoing 'by link id or execution_id', which is already implied by the schema. Since schema coverage is high, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'TestExecution.remove_link by link id or execution_id' clearly states the action (remove) and resource (link), and the parameter options are briefly noted. It differentiates from sibling tools like kiwi_execution_add_link through the verb 'remove', but does not explicitly distinguish itself from other removal tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that this is for removing existing links, nor does it advise on choosing between link_id and execution_id. The description is purely functional and lacks contextual usage directions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.