Create project (Product)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only include destructiveHint: false. The description adds a note about classification defaulting to the first classification, but does not disclose other behavioral aspects such as whether name must be unique, permissions required, or what happens on creation. The operation's side effects are not described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but not effectively concise. 'Product.create' is cryptic filler, and the classification sentence duplicates what the schema already provides. The description feels under-specified rather than intentionally compact.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with three parameters, a complete description should at least state that it creates a project. Here the core purpose is missing, and with no output schema and minimal annotations, the description leaves the agent without sufficient information to understand the tool's role.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all three parameters already have meaningful descriptions. The description repeats the classification default from the schema without adding additional meaning, so it stays at the baseline for high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Product.create' is a vague label that does not explicitly state the tool creates a project. The title provides clarity, but the description itself lacks a clear verb+resource statement and could even imply product creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus sibling create tools like kiwi_create_plan, kiwi_create_run, or kiwi_create_case. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or contextual cues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.