get_my_tasks
Retrieve your own tasks filtered by type: responsible, ball holding, or following.
Instructions
指定したタイプの自分のタスクを取得します
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| type | Yes | タイプ。responsible(担当)、ballHolding(ボール保持)、following(フォロー中)を指定できます。 |
Retrieve your own tasks filtered by type: responsible, ball holding, or following.
指定したタイプの自分のタスクを取得します
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| type | Yes | タイプ。responsible(担当)、ballHolding(ボール保持)、following(フォロー中)を指定できます。 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must convey behavioral traits. It only states the purpose, not whether it is read-only, pagination, or permissions. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with purpose. Efficient but could include a brief note on what the tool returns.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, and description omits return details, constraints, or examples. For a simple list tool, more context would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with enum values and description. Description adds no extra meaning beyond what schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it retrieves the user's tasks of a specified type. The tool name and description align. However, it does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like get_tasks or get_my_tasks_count.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_tasks or get_my_tasks_count. Lacks context for an agent to decide.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bellx2/repsona-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server