Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to canada-law

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides access to CanLII's Canadian legal information, enabling search and retrieval of court decisions, legislation, and citations through natural language.
      26 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search Taiwan's statutes by legal concept or keyword, fetch individual articles with official English translations, browse a law's structure, and search apex-court and Grand Chamber rulings or list every decision containing an exact phrase. All tools are read-only and query only public legal data, with Traditional Chinese queries translated by the assistant on request.
      CC BY-4.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search, retrieve, and analyze South Korean legal documents including statutes, precedents, constitutional decisions, and administrative rulings via the Ministry of Government Legislation Open API. Provides 89 specialized tools with features like legal abbreviation auto-recognition, annex extraction, and complex research chain workflows.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI systems to search, retrieve, and analyze Korean legal information from the National Law Information API (law.go.kr), including laws, administrative rules, English translations, and law-ordinance linkages.
      26
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access Washington State Legislature data for bill tracking, committee meetings, legislator lookup, and legislative document retrieval via conversational interfaces.
      9
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage of the workflow: terminology mapping, act discovery, table of contents, section retrieval, and full-text search. The descriptions explicitly spell out the boundaries (e.g. call map_term before search_law, use get_toc to pick a section before get_section). No two tools could plausibly be confused for each other.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All five tools follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern: map_term, find_act, get_toc, get_section, search_law. The convention is uniform and predictable across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a legislation lookup server; each tool earns its place in a clear pipeline from term mapping to section retrieval. Nothing feels redundant or missing at the count level.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: find acts/regulations, browse structure, read sections verbatim, and search statutory wording, including handling of repealed acts and citation metadata. Minor gaps exist (no explicit list/browse-by-jurisdiction tool or case-law coverage), but agents can work around these via find_act and search_law.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues