Skip to main content
Glama
beepboop2025

Undertow MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to Undertow MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides read-only MCP tools for market snapshots, position risk, order reconciliation, and daily report previews with deterministic financial calculations, evidence chains, and audit trails.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to Polymarket US public market data, including prices, order books, and spread/fee analytics, via MCP tools.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to Hyperliquid's public market, user, vault, and staking data via 61 MCP tools, covering perpetuals, spot, and borrow-lend information.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only Robinhood Chain market intelligence so AI agents can inspect token liquidity, simulate and compare size-aware exit pressure against observed pool depth, and explain the resulting grades with evidence and limits.
      5
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying real-time and historical financial market data for stocks, options, forex, and crypto, including quotes, trades, technical indicators, and reference data through a set of MCP tools.
      71
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to query historical Polymarket order book depth at 1-second resolution, including full L2 bid and ask ladders with resolved outcomes, alongside market search, price history, and liquidity metrics. It also exposes depth data that Polymarket's own API does not archive, letting users analyze what could actually have been traded at a specific past moment.
      8
      8 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct research outputs, but several live in the same BTC-depth/liquidity space (depth_episodes, venue_concentration, venue_price_reconciliation, exit_cost, trade_safety_exit_context). The descriptions separate them well, though exit_cost and trade_safety_exit_context could be confused at first glance.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All ten names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case noun-phrase convention, such as agent_access_status, liquidity_tiers, and venue_price_reconciliation. There is no mixing of naming styles, abbreviations, or inconsistent verb usage.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is a well-scoped size for a specialist liquidity and research server. Each tool addresses a distinct workflow area: access, editorial, trust, liquidity tiers, depth episodes, venue pricing, exit cost, and fund unwind stress.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core domain well: access checks, current liquidity overview, crypto depth analysis, venue price reconciliation, exit cost, fund unwind risk, editorial content, and sealed trust evidence. Minor gaps exist, such as no article archive and no ETH-specific depth episodes outside referenced subscriber tools, but these are disclosed rather than hidden and do not block primary workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues