remove_look_from_board

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does not say whether removal is permanent, whether the underlying look is deleted or merely unplaced from the board, or whether this is destructive. For a removal operation with zero annotation coverage, that is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no wasted words and the action front-loaded. It is appropriately sized for a one-parameter tool, though it is so terse that it contributes little.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description should at minimum disclose whether the removal is destructive and whether the look survives; it says neither. The tool is simple, but the missing destructive-semantics disclosure leaves an agent unable to predict consequences.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single required buttonId parameter, which the schema already documents as 'Button ID to remove'. The description adds no syntax, format, or scoping detail beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: remove a button from a look board. It is clear what the tool does, though it does not distinguish itself from siblings like bulk_delete_look_board_buttons or update_look_board_button, and the wording ('button') diverges slightly from the tool name ('remove_look_from_board'), which could cause a moment of confusion over whether a look or a button is removed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no indication of when to use this versus the bulk variants (bulk_delete_look_board_buttons) or full-board deletion (delete_look_board). No prerequisites or context for invocation are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.