Skip to main content
Glama
bbernstein

LacyLights MCP Server

by bbernstein

Related Servers

Alternatives to LacyLights MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Transforms an ETC Eos lighting console into a service controllable by AI assistants and automation tools via MCP and OSC, enabling cue management, preset recall, and channel level control.
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI assistants control grandMA2 lighting consoles via Telnet, exposing 41 high-level tools for cue management, fixture control, preset management, executor control, macro editing, appearance assignment, bulk operations, console state queries, show file management, read-back verification, and music show workflows.
      100
      14
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-driven control of MADRIX LED lighting software, providing over 100 tools for storage, layer, cue list, timeline, audio, output, and color management via the MADRIX Remote HTTP interface.
      100
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language-driven human-centric lighting analysis, including CIE S 026 α-opic and circadian metrics, spectral sky reconstruction from EPW files, and Radiance daylight/electric/glare simulation.
      51
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM control of ETC Eos Family lighting consoles via OSC, allowing operation of cues, levels, subs, macros, and the full Eos command line.
      20
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., list_projects vs. create_project vs. delete_project), but a few pairs like optimize_scene/update_scene and generate_act_cues/create_cue_sequence could cause confusion if descriptions are not explicit. Overall, the boundaries are mostly clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_projects, create_fixture_instance, optimize_cue_timing). No mixed conventions or vague verbs are present.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 24 tools, the set feels heavy for a single server, but it covers multiple subdomains (projects, fixtures, scenes, cues, script analysis) where each tool has a specific role. It is within the 16-25 heavy range, so not ideal but not extreme.

    Completeness4/5

    Core CRUD and analysis operations are well-covered for projects, fixtures, scenes, and cues. Minor gaps exist such as missing delete operations for fixtures and scenes, and no update_project, but these are not critical to the main workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues