LacyLights MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to LacyLights MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceTransforms an ETC Eos lighting console into a service controllable by AI assistants and automation tools via MCP and OSC, enabling cue management, preset recall, and channel level control.1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAnalyzes music and generates xLights light show sequences, compatible with any MCP-compatible AI tool.4MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants control grandMA2 lighting consoles via Telnet, exposing 41 high-level tools for cue management, fixture control, preset management, executor control, macro editing, appearance assignment, bulk operations, console state queries, show file management, read-back verification, and music show workflows.10014Apache 2.0
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-driven control of MADRIX LED lighting software, providing over 100 tools for storage, layer, cue list, timeline, audio, output, and color management via the MADRIX Remote HTTP interface.1003Apache 2.0
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural-language-driven human-centric lighting analysis, including CIE S 026 α-opic and circadian metrics, spectral sky reconstruction from EPW files, and Radiance daylight/electric/glare simulation.51-
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLM control of ETC Eos Family lighting consoles via OSC, allowing operation of cues, levels, subs, macros, and the full Eos command line.20MIT
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes (e.g., list_projects vs. create_project vs. delete_project), but a few pairs like optimize_scene/update_scene and generate_act_cues/create_cue_sequence could cause confusion if descriptions are not explicit. Overall, the boundaries are mostly clear.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_projects, create_fixture_instance, optimize_cue_timing). No mixed conventions or vague verbs are present.
With 24 tools, the set feels heavy for a single server, but it covers multiple subdomains (projects, fixtures, scenes, cues, script analysis) where each tool has a specific role. It is within the 16-25 heavy range, so not ideal but not extreme.
Core CRUD and analysis operations are well-covered for projects, fixtures, scenes, and cues. Minor gaps exist such as missing delete operations for fixtures and scenes, and no update_project, but these are not critical to the main workflows.