arr-mcp

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

Approve or decline a request

respond_to_request

Approve or decline a pending Seerr request by previewing the verdict, then confirming to hand approved media to Radarr or Sonarr for download.

Instructions

Approves or declines a pending Seerr request. Approving hands it to Radarr or Sonarr, which will search for it and download it — so it costs disk space and bandwidth even though the decision itself is reversible. Take id from get_requests. Previews first; confirm to apply the verdict.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`id`	Yes	The Seerr request id, as get_requests reported it.
`confirm`	No	The token from this tool's preview, passed back verbatim to apply it. Single-use and bound to the previewed arguments.
`dry_run`	No	Preview without a confirm token, for "what would happen if" questions; not the first step of a real change.
`verdict`	Yes	approve or decline.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`noop`	Yes
`tier`	Yes
`tool`	Yes
`result`	No
`target`	Yes
`applied`	Yes
`dry_run`	Yes
`effects`	Yes
`service`	Yes
`summary`	Yes
`audit_id`	No
`warnings`	No
`operation`	Yes
`unchecked`	No
`next_steps`	No
`permission`	Yes
`confirm_error`	No
`confirm_token`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed17 schema fields changedv1.74.0Nov 9, 2026

removedInput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"

changedInput schema / properties / confirm / description

Previous value: -"The confirmation token from this same tool's preview of this same operation. Omit it to get a preview and a token; pass the token back verbatim to apply the change. Tokens are single-use, expire, and are bound to the exact operation and arguments previewed."New value: +"The token from this tool's preview, passed back verbatim to apply it. Single-use and bound to the previewed arguments."

changedInput schema / properties / dry_run / description

Previous value: -"Preview only: resolve the target and describe exactly what would happen, then stop. Never mutates anything and never returns a confirmation token. Use this to answer \"what would happen if…\" — not as the first step of actually doing it."New value: +"Preview without a confirm token, for \"what would happen if\" questions; not the first step of a real change."

removedOutput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"

removedOutput schema / properties / applied / description

Removed value: -"Whether the change actually happened. False on every preview, refusal and no-op."

removedOutput schema / properties / audit_id / description

Removed value: -"The audit row this call wrote. Every branch writes one, including previews and refusals."

removedOutput schema / properties / confirm_error / description

Removed value: -"Why a presented token was rejected. Present only when one was presented."

removedOutput schema / properties / confirm_token / description

Removed value: -"Present when a preview is awaiting confirmation. Single-use, expiring, bound to this exact operation and arguments."

removedOutput schema / properties / dry_run / description

Removed value: -"Whether this was an explicit preview."

removedOutput schema / properties / effects / description

Removed value: -"Itemised consequences, most severe first. Empty is legitimate for a no-op."

removedOutput schema / properties / next_steps / description

Removed value: -"Present on an applied write when another call is worth offering. Offer it to the person; do not run it."

removedOutput schema / properties / noop / description

Removed value: -"True when the request resolved but there was nothing to do — already monitored, already approved."

removedOutput schema / properties / result / description

Removed value: -"Whatever the service returned, on a write that landed."

removedOutput schema / properties / summary / description
```
Removed value: -"One sentence, safe to show a human."
```

removedOutput schema / properties / target / description

Removed value: -"The resolved id the write acts on — what the confirmation token is bound to."

removedOutput schema / properties / unchecked / description

Removed value: -"Present when a service could not be asked, so its absence from `warnings` means nothing."

removedOutput schema / properties / warnings / description

Removed value: -"Present on a preview when another service has something to say about this change. Tell the user before confirming."

First observedv0.1.0Nov 9, 2026

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the readOnlyHint=false / destructiveHint=false annotations by disclosing the downstream consequence: approval hands the item to Radarr or Sonarr, triggering a search and download that consumes disk space and bandwidth. It also clarifies that the decision itself is reversible, and documents the preview/confirm token flow, which is exactly the behavioral context an agent needs before mutating state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the action, then the cost consequence, then the workflow. No filler and nothing buried.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need no explanation, and the cost/reversibility/preview details cover the main risks of a mutating tool. The one gap is what a decline actually does to the underlying request versus delete_request, which the agent must infer from siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds provenance for `id` (from get_requests) and frames the preview-then-confirm sequencing that ties `confirm` and `dry_run` together, giving marginal meaning beyond the field-level docs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb pair and resource: approves or declines a pending Seerr request. This is clearly separable from siblings like delete_request (permanent removal) and get_requests (listing), so an agent can pick it without opening another schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit workflow guidance: take `id` from get_requests, preview first, then confirm to apply. It does not explicitly contrast with delete_request or explain when declining is preferable to deleting, but the routing instruction is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.