arr-mcp

by bardesss

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

TypeScript

Local

Delete a request

delete_request

Destructive

Deletes a Seerr request record after preview and confirmation, keeping downloaded media intact in Radarr or Sonarr.

Instructions

Deletes a Seerr request record entirely. This removes the request, not the media — anything already downloaded stays on disk and in Radarr or Sonarr. Use respond_to_request with decline to refuse a request while keeping the record. Take id from get_requests. Previews first; confirm to delete it.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`id`	Yes	The Seerr request id, as get_requests reported it.
`confirm`	No	The token from this tool's preview, passed back verbatim to apply it. Single-use and bound to the previewed arguments.
`dry_run`	No	Preview without a confirm token, for "what would happen if" questions; not the first step of a real change.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`noop`	Yes
`tier`	Yes
`tool`	Yes
`result`	No
`target`	Yes
`applied`	Yes
`dry_run`	Yes
`effects`	Yes
`service`	Yes
`summary`	Yes
`audit_id`	No
`warnings`	No
`operation`	Yes
`unchecked`	No
`next_steps`	No
`permission`	Yes
`confirm_error`	No
`confirm_token`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed17 schema fields changedv1.74.0Nov 9, 2026

removedInput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"

changedInput schema / properties / confirm / description

Previous value: -"The confirmation token from this same tool's preview of this same operation. Omit it to get a preview and a token; pass the token back verbatim to apply the change. Tokens are single-use, expire, and are bound to the exact operation and arguments previewed."New value: +"The token from this tool's preview, passed back verbatim to apply it. Single-use and bound to the previewed arguments."

changedInput schema / properties / dry_run / description

Previous value: -"Preview only: resolve the target and describe exactly what would happen, then stop. Never mutates anything and never returns a confirmation token. Use this to answer \"what would happen if…\" — not as the first step of actually doing it."New value: +"Preview without a confirm token, for \"what would happen if\" questions; not the first step of a real change."

removedOutput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"

removedOutput schema / properties / applied / description

Removed value: -"Whether the change actually happened. False on every preview, refusal and no-op."

removedOutput schema / properties / audit_id / description

Removed value: -"The audit row this call wrote. Every branch writes one, including previews and refusals."

removedOutput schema / properties / confirm_error / description

Removed value: -"Why a presented token was rejected. Present only when one was presented."

removedOutput schema / properties / confirm_token / description

Removed value: -"Present when a preview is awaiting confirmation. Single-use, expiring, bound to this exact operation and arguments."

removedOutput schema / properties / dry_run / description

Removed value: -"Whether this was an explicit preview."

removedOutput schema / properties / effects / description

Removed value: -"Itemised consequences, most severe first. Empty is legitimate for a no-op."

removedOutput schema / properties / next_steps / description

Removed value: -"Present on an applied write when another call is worth offering. Offer it to the person; do not run it."

removedOutput schema / properties / noop / description

Removed value: -"True when the request resolved but there was nothing to do — already monitored, already approved."

removedOutput schema / properties / result / description

Removed value: -"Whatever the service returned, on a write that landed."

removedOutput schema / properties / summary / description
```
Removed value: -"One sentence, safe to show a human."
```

removedOutput schema / properties / target / description

Removed value: -"The resolved id the write acts on — what the confirmation token is bound to."

removedOutput schema / properties / unchecked / description

Removed value: -"Present when a service could not be asked, so its absence from `warnings` means nothing."

removedOutput schema / properties / warnings / description

Removed value: -"Present on a preview when another service has something to say about this change. Tell the user before confirming."

First observedv0.1.0Nov 9, 2026

TDQS

A4.9/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag destructiveHint=true, but the description adds the crucial scope of destruction — the request record goes, downloaded files and Radarr/Sonarr entries remain — which the annotations cannot express. It also discloses the two-phase preview-then-confirm workflow, giving the agent the operational shape of the call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the destructive scope, then the alternative, then the identifier source, then the confirm flow. No filler, and the most consequential fact (media is not deleted) appears before anything else.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive single-entity delete with a full-coverage schema and an output schema, the description covers everything an agent needs: what is removed, what survives, where the id comes from, the sibling alternative, and the preview/confirm requirement. No gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the field-level meaning of `id`, `confirm`, and `dry_run` is already documented. The description still adds workflow semantics by stating 'Previews first; confirm to delete it,' which tells the agent the ordering relationship between dry_run and confirm rather than leaving them as independent flags.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Deletes a Seerr request record entirely') and immediately bounds the scope by clarifying it is not the media. That distinction separates it cleanly from siblings like delete_media and respond_to_request without requiring the agent to open either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the alternative case: 'Use respond_to_request with `decline` to refuse a request while keeping the record,' and tells the agent where the identifier comes from ('Take `id` from get_requests'). Both a when-to-use-this and a when-to-use-something-else condition are present.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.