Skip to main content
Glama
ballz4z4

FlagForge MCP Server

by ballz4z4

Related Servers

Alternatives to FlagForge MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with CTFd platforms for Capture The Flag competitions, allowing users to list challenges, read details, manage dynamic Docker containers, and submit flags through natural language.
      5
      38 PyPI
      25
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to AttackForge's Self-Service API with full endpoint coverage, response size optimization, and local caching for efficient use in long conversations.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with a Forgejo instance as an authenticated user, supporting issues, pull requests, repositories, and notifications.
      40 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to solve CTF challenges through natural language by disassembling binaries, cracking hashes, fuzzing web applications, extracting steganography, and running pwntools exploits.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a specific resource and action pair: events, challenges, evidence, flags, writeups, artifacts, and knowledge search. The only possible near-overlap between update_challenge and set_challenge_status is resolved by the latter being explicitly scoped to lifecycle status.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern throughout, such as list_*, create_*, get_*, update_*, delete_*, save_*, and upload_*. This makes the intended action of each tool predictable and easy to select.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 19 tools, the set is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, but the breadth is justified by the full CTF workflow: events, challenge CRUD, status/locking, evidence, flags, writeups, artifacts, and search. No tools are redundant; each contributes a distinct operation.

    Completeness4/5

    The core challenge lifecycle is well covered with create/read/update/delete plus status, locking, evidence, flags, writeups, and artifacts. Minor gaps exist around event updates/deletes and direct artifact retrieval, but agents can work around these for solving and documentation workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues