hamravesh-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to hamravesh-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server do create and deploy backend applications using https://heim.dev66 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with QUADS infrastructure systems via API, enabling resource management and automation through LLM applications.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for generating Kubernetes manifests (deployments, services, configmaps, secrets, ingresses, namespaces) and performing kubectl operations like apply, delete, get, describe, logs, and exec.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that wraps CubeCoders AMP to list, inspect, and control game-server instances.84MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFastMCP server for managing a self-hosted Infisical instance, exposing tools to create, read, update, and delete projects, environments, folders, and secrets, and to render .env and shell-export formats.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools to interact with the LiteLLM proxy API, enabling LLM completions, embeddings, image generation, and admin operations.7 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource/action, and the main potential confusions (e.g., list_saas vs. list_marketplace_products, create_saas vs. create_app) are clarified by their descriptions. A couple of similar lifecycle actions on different resources could still cause misselection, but the boundaries are mostly clear.
The dominant hamravesh_verb_noun pattern is consistent and readable. The few exceptions like app_containers, app_logs, app_manifests, and database_power break the otherwise predictable convention, but they are still recognizable and not chaotic.
At 30 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold and feels heavy even for a broad cloud-management API. Several write tools are disabled by default, and some subresource operations could plausibly be consolidated, making the surface larger than necessary.
Core app and database lifecycles are well covered, including create/read/delete, but SaaS has no update/delete tool, database plans/updates are missing as dedicated tools, and app updates are limited to envs/basic auth. The raw hamravesh_request tool helps agents work around these gaps, but notable operations still lack first-class support.