site_unfreeze

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds valuable context about activation latency (5-10 minutes) that isn't in annotations. No annotation contradictions. The annotations declare it's not read-only and not destructive, which is consistent with smoothing a state change.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise: one sentence for purpose and one for timing, plus the arg. No waste, front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists so return values needn't be described. However, for a state-changing operation, the description is thin on prerequisites (e.g., must the site be frozen first?), permissions, or what specifically gets unfrozen. Latency note helps but more behavioral context would improve it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (site_id) with 0% schema description coverage. The description repeats 'site_id: ID сайта' from the schema title but adds no semantic depth about format, validation, or how to obtain it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action (unfreeze file changes) on a specific resource (site). The sibling tool site_freeze exists, implying the inverse, but the description doesn't explicitly name the counterpart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (to make changes when the site is frozen), but doesn't explicitly state when to use versus checking site_is_frozen first or what conditions trigger freezing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.