mysql_add

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the write-but-not-destructive nature is covered. The description adds the useful naming convention (final DB name = login_suffix) but says nothing about side effects, required permissions, or whether a DB user is auto-created alongside the database.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Short, front-loaded, and well organized with a title line followed by an Args list. Every line carries information; only minor value is lost by not compressing the parameter notes further.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained. For a creation tool with two required parameters, the description leaves out usage conditions and the side effect of database/user creation, making it only minimally sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the load, and it does explain both parameters briefly: suffix is the DB name portion and password is the DB access password. The composition rule 'login_suffix' adds real meaning, but format constraints (allowed characters, length) remain undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Добавить базу MySQL' = add a MySQL database), which clearly separates it from mysql_list, mysql_delete, and mysql_add_access. The naming rule (login_suffix) further distinguishes it, though it does not explicitly name a sibling it is not.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus mysql_add_access, mysql_change_password, or mysql_list. There are no prerequisites or exclusions stated, leaving the agent to infer the entire usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.