No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 55 tools
Tools are clearly organized by category prefixes (cfg_, dep_, report_, rt_, sast_, scanner_) with distinct, specific names within each group. Potential overlaps like rt_check_tool_poisoning and rt_check_prompt_injection are differentiated by target (tool descriptions vs. prompt content).
All tools follow a consistent prefix_category_descriptiveName pattern in snake_case (e.g., cfg_audit_mcp_config, sast_command_injection). The scanner_ tools deviate slightly (scanner_list_checks, scanner_owasp_mapping) but remain consistent within their subgroup.
55 tools is high but justified for a comprehensive security scanner covering config, dependencies, runtime, static analysis, and reporting. While some tools could potentially be merged, each addresses a specific security concern, and the count reflects the domain's breadth.
The tool set covers all major security audit areas: configuration auditing, dependency analysis, static code analysis, runtime checks, reporting, and OWASP mapping. No obvious gaps; even includes meta-tools for listing checks and comparing reports.