dns-security-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dns-security-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDomain security reconnaissance for AI agents — 13 tools (DNS+DNSSEC, SSL/TLS, HTTP security headers, SPF/DKIM/DMARC email auth, port scan, ASN, RDAP/WHOIS) plus a one-shot security_scan returning a 0–100 Health Score (A–F). Free, no API key.1570 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to audit email and domain security (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, etc.) for any domain without requiring API keys.19137 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform passive security scans on domains, checking email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS weaknesses, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain-takeover risk without needing an API key.747 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI agents with 37 OSINT tools and 12 data sources to perform unified reconnaissance, domain analysis, and attack surface mapping. It enables agents to query, correlate, and reason across platforms like Shodan, VirusTotal, and Censys in parallel.37204 npm53MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceSecurity intelligence API for AI models. CVE lookup with EPSS/KEV, domain recon (DNS, WHOIS, SSL, subdomains, WAF), and code security checks (secrets, injection, headers). 16 tools, no API key required.5533MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA comprehensive reconnaissance toolset that provides AI agents with 37 tools across 12 data sources like Shodan and VirusTotal for automated intelligence gathering. It enables agents to perform domain reconnaissance, attack surface mapping, and cross-platform data correlation within a single conversational interface.37204 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 104 tools
Several tools have nearly identical purposes, such as dns_server_fingerprint vs infra_software_cve, dns_zone_transfer vs infra_axfr_protection, and infra_open_resolver vs dns_recursive_check. Additional overlap exists between homoglyph and IDN homograph tools and multiple reputation/risk scoring tools, making selection genuinely ambiguous despite helpful descriptions.
Names follow a reasonably consistent category-prefix snake_case pattern (tunnel_, ct_, dnssec_, email_, hijack_, etc.), making the tool surface navigable. However, action words are mixed—check, detect, audit, scan, validate—and aggregators alternate between full_scan and full_audit, so the pattern is not perfectly uniform.
With 104 tools, this server is far beyond what an agent can efficiently consider during tool selection. The count is more than double the 50+ threshold for extreme mismatch, and many tools could be consolidated into parameterized or higher-level aggregate tools.
The tool set provides remarkably broad coverage of DNS security: tunneling, DNSSEC, email authentication, typosquatting, blocklists, certificate transparency, hijack detection, privacy, infrastructure, and reporting. There are no obvious missing capabilities for a DNS security assessment server.