pulsedive_indicator

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description indicates read-only retrieval ('look up', 'returns risk level...'), so no hidden destructive behavior. But lacks details on side effects, rate limits, or dependency on external data freshness. Adequate for a simple lookup but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that efficiently captures purpose and output. No wasted words; front-loaded with actionable verb and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Low complexity tool (1 param, no nested objects, no output schema). Description covers purpose, input types, and key output fields. Could briefly mention expected format (e.g., full URL vs domain) or error handling, but meets minimum for a straightforward lookup.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema already provides 100% coverage with description for the single parameter. Tool description repeats same info (IP, domain, URL, or hash) but adds no new semantic detail beyond schema. Baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'look up' + specific resource 'indicator on Pulsedive' and types listed (IP, domain, URL, hash) and return values. However, does not differentiate from sibling tools pulsedive_explore or pulsedive_search, which could be confused for similar functions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings, no exclusions or prerequisites. Agent must infer from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.