otx_ip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only lists outputs without discussing side effects, rate limits, authentication, or data freshness. As a read-only lookup, minimal behavioral disclosure is acceptable but not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences with purpose and outputs front-loaded. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple tool with one parameter and no output schema; description adequately covers purpose and returned data. Could mention error conditions or data format, but overall complete for typical use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single 'ip' parameter, with clear schema description. Description adds minimal context ('via AlienVant OTX') but does not enhance parameter understanding beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Look up threat intelligence for an IP address via AlienVant OTX' with specific outputs (pulse info, reputation, country, ASN). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like abuseipdb_check or greynoise_ip.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage is for IP threat intelligence from AlienVant OTX, but no explicit guidance on when to use this versus alternatives among many sibling threat intelligence tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.