a207-meal-plan-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to a207-meal-plan-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server generates individualized meal plans for children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on KDIGO 2024/PRNT 2020/KRCP 2025 guidelines, incorporating patient age, CKD stage, allergies, dietary culture, and diet diary analysis. It provides deterministic nutrient computations and tools for meal plan generation, food database lookup, and risk analysis.13MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables pediatric CKD nutrition assessment by calculating PRNT energy/protein targets, evaluating dietary intake against those targets, and screening for PEW risk, with support for dialysis, vegetarian diets, and edema corrections.5-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for pediatric CKD nutrition and food calculations, enabling energy/protein targets, food nutrient lookup, substitutions, meal summaries, and drug-nutrient interaction checks.8-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides deterministic parental guidance for children with chronic kidney disease, including food safety checks, lab report interpretation, and nutrient-aware food substitutions based on authoritative guidelines and the Chinese Food Composition Table.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGenerates personalized 7-day meal plans based on user profile and goals, and provides daily calorie catch-up suggestions when intake falls short.61MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for pediatric CKD follow-up management, providing tools to schedule follow-ups based on KDIGO 2024 guidelines, retrieve follow-up records, compute adherence scores, and access PEW history.4-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one generates a new meal plan, the other aggregates nutrient data from an existing plan. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'generate_meal_plan' and 'get_meal_plan_nutrients'. The naming style is uniform and predictable.
With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal. While the narrow scope is defensible, it sits at the borderline where 1-2 tools are typically considered thin for a functional domain.
The tool surface covers generation and nutrient validation, but lacks update/delete/list operations for meal plans. There are notable gaps in lifecycle management, though the core generation workflow is present.