list_oscal_resources

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description describes the return format (structured markdown) and potential errors (FileNotFoundError, IOError). It could mention if the resource list is static or fetched dynamically, but overall it adequately discloses behavior for a read-only resource tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose, uses bullet points for user query examples, and includes structured Args/Returns/Raises sections. Every sentence adds value and is not redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, no annotations, and an output schema that likely details the markdown structure, the description covers purpose, usage, errors, and content format comprehensively. No gaps identified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters and 100% schema coverage trivially. The description adds no parameter details because none exist, matching the baseline for no parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves a 'comprehensive directory of OSCAL community resources and tools', with a specific verb and resource. It differentiates from sibling tools which focus on listing specific OSCAL models and queries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly lists example user queries that should trigger this tool, such as 'What OSCAL tools are available?' and 'How can I learn more about OSCAL?', providing clear context for when to use it over alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.