MCP Server for OSCAL
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Server for OSCAL
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides comprehensive access to NIST cybersecurity frameworks and controls, enabling AI assistants and applications to query, analyze, and manage NIST security controls through a standardized interface.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides structured access to the full NIST cybersecurity catalog, including SP 800/1800 publications, security controls, CSF 2.0, and the NVD database. It enables AI assistants to search and retrieve cybersecurity standards, CVEs, and compliance guidance directly from a local SQLite index.201MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible agents to query security checklists, protocols, and framework mappings to safely build and operate AI agents, with tools for checklist runs, protocol lookup, mapping lookup, and threat search.9CC BY-4.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides tools for AI assistants to access the Agent Web Protocol (AWP) specification, validate agent.json files, and generate protocol-compliant configurations. It enables developers to integrate the AWP standard into their websites through natural language prompts and automated validation.4 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and IDEs to work with the AGNTCY Agent Directory, providing tools for validating, publishing, searching agent records, and navigating OASF taxonomies.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to list, find, fetch, and look up JSON Schema documents from the SchemaStore catalog.1 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 40 tools
Each tool targets a distinct operation or resource: list_* for paginated child elements, query_* for document-level queries, get_* for single items, validate_* for validation, and text_search for full-text search. No two tools have overlapping purposes.
Tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_catalogs, query_profile, get_capability). Even 'about' and 'text_search_oscal' fit the pattern. The naming is predictable and uniform across all 40 tools.
40 tools is on the higher side but appropriate for the complex OSCAL domain covering multiple document types, child elements, validation, and search. Each tool earns its place; the count reflects the domain's breadth rather than redundancy.
The tool surface covers all major OSCAL document types with list, query, and child-element tools, plus validation, schema retrieval, documentation query, and full-text search. For a read-only server, there are no obvious gaps.