Update Features

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The destructiveHint annotation is present, indicating modification. The description adds the return count but does not disclose error handling, validation, or consequences of invalid fids. With annotations carrying the destructive hint, a score of 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, efficiently front-loaded with the purpose and an example. No redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the basic operation and return value but lacks information on error handling, prerequisites, or behavior when features are missing. Given no output schema, additional context would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates by providing an example structure for the `updates` parameter, clarifying the format beyond the schema's minimal definition. However, `layer_id` remains only named.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Update feature attributes.' It provides a concrete example of the update structure, distinguishing it from siblings like add_features or delete_features.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., add_features, delete_features). It implicitly indicates use for modifying existing features but lacks context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.