Get QGIS Info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation already indicates readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds little beyond stating the data fetched. No behavioral traits like side effects or requirements are disclosed, but no contradictions occur.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with 7 words, containing no wasted text. It is front-loaded with the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the zero parameters, readOnly annotation, and presence of an output schema, the description sufficiently covers the tool's purpose without needing to detail return values.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and schema coverage is 100%. Per rubric, baseline is 4. Description correctly implies no input needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Get QGIS version, profile path, and plugin count.' This provides a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_project_info or get_plugin_info.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_project_info, get_plugin_info, or get_raster_info. The description lacks context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.