qbit_resume

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description discloses reversibility but lacks other behavioral details like permissions, idempotency, error states.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise (2 sentences), front-loaded with purpose. Minor issue: ambiguous term 'via qui' may reduce clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple tool with one parameter; covers purpose and key trait (reversibility). Lacks error handling or response info, but output schema is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% coverage; description adds meaning by clarifying that 'hash' can be a full hash or unique prefix, but does not specify format or length.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states verb 'Resume' and resource 'torrent', with specific identifier method (hash/prefix). Differentiates from siblings like qbit_pause, but no explicit sibling differentiation in text.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., qbit_pause, qbit_delete_torrent). Only mentions reversibility, not selection context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.