qbit_pause

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description provides some transparency by stating pausing is reversible and no confirmation is required. However, it does not detail side effects (e.g., seeding status, download cancellation) or permission needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core action and method. No unnecessary words; every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 param, no nested objects), the description covers the action and parameter usage. An output schema exists, but the description lacks return value details; still sufficient for most agents.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds meaning by clarifying that the hash parameter accepts a full hash or a unique prefix. This is valuable beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Pause a torrent' with a specific resource (torrent) and method (by hash or unique prefix). It distinguishes from siblings like qbit_resume and qbit_delete_torrent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. While it's implied when pausing is desired, there is no discussion of when not to use it or comparison to sibling tools like qbit_delete_torrent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.