Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to effectfence

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exactly-once execution for irreversible agent actions: an agent claims the right to run an effect, and a retry after a lost response returns the sealed result instead of charging again. 12 tools over stdio, including a gateway mode where the agent holds a single-use ticket and never the provider key.
      9
      50 PyPI
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides durable mission state for AI agents, enabling crash-safe recovery, verified completion, and explicit reconciliation of uncertain side effects without duplicate or blind retries.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Post-quantum, tamper-evident receipts for consequential agent actions. Provides tools for auditing, gating decisions, and egress classification with quantum-hardened security.
      7
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to use payment APIs safely by gating every tool call through deterministic mandates, value checks, and an exactly-once ledger, so they cannot pay twice or exceed authorisation.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with a transparent proxy and journal for every tool action, including pre-state snapshots and approval gates for risky operations. Enables per-action undo, rewind to a point in time, and a kill switch that agents cannot override.
      9 npm
      Business Source 1.1

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in the effect lifecycle: prepare initiates, commit reports success, abort reports failure. There is no overlap or ambiguity among them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the consistent pattern 'fence_' + verb (prepare, commit, abort). This is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is precisely right for the narrow, well-defined domain of effect fencing. Each tool is necessary and none is superfluous.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full lifecycle: prepare to request permission, commit for success, abort for failure. There are no obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues