Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to atomicreps

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An interactive learning assistant that helps developers understand AI-generated code changes through quizzes and blocking learning sessions. It tracks and searches debugging experiences using RAG to ensure users build long-term technical understanding rather than just copy-pasting solutions.
      4
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables developers to compare their code predictions against AI-generated implementations, log misconceptions, and receive spaced-repetition learning feedback to guide their understanding of gaps.
      20 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables local, progressive technical coaching inside MCP-compatible AI agents, delivering short targeted lessons calibrated to the user's knowledge after each completed task while storing everything in a local SQLite file.
      88 npm
      5
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an active learning tutor that runs in MCP clients like Codex or Claude Code, letting the AI create and manage lessons, read student attempts, and give feedback while the student practices in a local browser panel.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to act as a state-driven tutoring engine over MCP, with server-side mastery estimation, prerequisite checks, evidence-based assessment, and FSRS spaced review scheduling.
      58
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables offline coding interview practice with original problems, local test harnesses, tiered hints, and streak tracking within MCP-compatible agents.
      4 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct part of the workflow: rep handles the rep itself, answer grades a pick, me reports user stats, and settings configures preferences. The rep/answer boundary is clear enough from descriptions, though both revolve around the same rep concept.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are lowercase single words, which is readable, but they mix nouns (rep, settings), a pronoun (me), and a verb (answer). There is no consistent verb_noun or action-resource pattern across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for this server's apparent purpose. The core loop (rep, answer) plus user status (me) and configuration (settings) each earns its place without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers creating/receiving a rep, grading an answer, viewing user progress, and changing settings. Minor lifecycle gaps exist, such as explicit history or deletion operations, but the core interaction cycle is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues