A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables controlling Cisco Packet Tracer through its native PTMP/IPC interface to create devices and links, configure IOS and PC addresses, run real ping tests, save .pkt files, and export topology as PNG.
14
1
MIT
Tracerlab
Related Servers
Alternatives to Tracerlab
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables headless creation, parsing, and grading of Cisco Packet Tracer .pkt/.pka lab files, including CCNA activity scoring, through MCP tools without requiring Packet Tracer to run.6MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables automation of Cisco Packet Tracer simulations by placing devices, connecting links, and generating IOS configurations via MCP, ideal for network coursework and demonstrations.231MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables external control of Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0 through MCP, allowing users to create network topologies, configure routers, and launch simulations from MCP clients.9 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables agents to design Cisco Packet Tracer labs from a device/link spec — cables, IPs, VLANs, routing and DHCP — and generate ready-configured .pkt files, .pka activities and SVG previews without opening Packet Tracer. It also exposes primitives to add, edit and inspect devices, services, ACLs and NAT in existing lab files.GPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceDrives a running Cisco Packet Tracer over its native IPC protocol (PTMP): build and cable topologies, configure IOS, test with ping and simulation mode, and reach the whole IPC API through 72 tools.723MIT
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 42 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Several tools overlap by design: pt_show vs pt_cli (mode=exec) both run EXEC commands, pt_build vs pt_lab both construct whole topologies, and pt_apply_feature vs ios_generate vs pt_cli all produce/apply IOS config. The descriptions do provide guidance (e.g. 'prefer pt_show', dry_run on pt_apply_feature), so boundaries are workable but require careful reading.
Naming Consistency3/5
Names are snake_case throughout, but the surface mixes several prefix families (pt_, pkt_, net_, ios_) and verb styles, including bare nouns like pt_topology, pt_device and pt_status. The grouping is semantically meaningful but not a uniform verb_noun convention, so an agent must learn each family.
Tool Count2/5
42 tools is heavy for a Packet Tracer bridge, and much of the count comes from layered abstractions of the same jobs (build/lab/add_devices/connect vs pt_cli, pt_show vs pt_cli, ios_generate vs pt_apply_feature). The extra granularity is useful for power users but expands the selection space considerably.
Completeness5/5
The surface covers the full lifecycle: topology inspection, device/cable CRUD, modules, IOS and host configuration, auto-addressing and routing, verification (ping/traceroute/ping_matrix), file operations, offline .pkt inspection/conversion, subnet math, and a JS escape hatch. Very few obvious gaps remain for the stated Packet Tracer domain.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues