Codex Pets
Related Servers
Alternatives to Codex Pets
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for interfacing with the official Model Context Protocol registry. Enables Claude and other MCP clients to dynamically discover, browse, search, and manage MCP servers directly from GitHub.52MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to search a catalogue of 648,000+ coding-agent mods with measured metrics such as token cost, security grade, and originality, and to fetch full details for any mod directly from Claude Desktop or any MCP client.7 npmMIT

Sigistry Plugin Catalogofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRead-only, authless MCP server over the Sigistry registry: a security-verified catalog of Claude Code plugins and portable skills. Search plugins and skills, fetch install commands, and read MCP-server security scorecards.MIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceOpen registry of agent instruction files — system prompts, skills, workflows, and domain packs. Exposes the OpenClaw registry via 4 MCP tools: search by keyword/category, fetch full instruction files, list categories, and get top-rated files. CC0 licensed, free to use.455 npm1MIT

io.github.OnticX/open-mcpofficial
FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA registry that enables MCP clients to discover and install MCP servers.1-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to fetch open package metadata across 100+ registries and to resolve every registry a given package or repository is published to via package URL or repository URL. Also exposes the supported registry catalog with ecosystem and package counts, keylessly over MCP or plain HTTP.46 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: badge, card, embed, install instructions, pet details, search, and request info. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference others to avoid confusion.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: get_* for fetching specific resources and search_* for discovery. Naming is uniform and predictable.
Seven tools cover the full range of user interactions with approved Codex pets, from getting code snippets to searching. The count feels well-scoped without unnecessary tools.
The tool set covers all likely user needs for approved pets: discovery, details, all common embed forms (badge, card, embed, install), and request info. Missing creation/editing are intentionally out of scope.