Skip to main content
Glama
askads

VK Ads MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to VK Ads MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for VK Ads API enabling management of campaigns, ads, statistics, targeting, and budgets through natural language.
      8
      19 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for VK Ads API (myTarget v2) that allows AI agents to manage advertising accounts: create and modify campaigns, ads, upload creatives, and fetch statistics.
      145 npm
      6
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local MCP server that integrates with VK Ads API and Core VK API, providing 128 tools for managing ad campaigns, audiences, creatives, statistics, and analyzing VK communities.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for analyzing VK Ads campaigns, listing ad structures, retrieving statistics, and generating optimization recommendations.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Meta/Facebook Marketing API allowing you to view and manage ad accounts, campaigns, ad sets, ads, and creatives, as well as fetch insights and upload ad images.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables natural-language interaction with the Avito Ads advertising API, including campaign, ad group, and creative management, statistics retrieval, fund transfers, and ORD paperwork filing.
      26
      60 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are largely distinct by resource (auth, throttling, regions, ad plans, groups, banners, statistics, raw). The action tools (create/update/delete) for each resource are clearly separated. Slight ambiguity between raw_request and the specific tools, but raw_request is explicitly a fallback, making the boundary clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, create_, update_, action). However, there are deviations: 'auth_status', 'start_login', 'finish_login', 'logout' use a different style, and 'get_throttling' and 'get_regions' are fine but 'ad_plan_action' could be more consistent as 'update_ad_plan_status'. Minor inconsistencies, but overall predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 22 tools, the server is on the heavier side but still reasonable for a full ad management platform. Each tool maps to a distinct entity or workflow, covering auth, config, and core CRUD plus statistics and a raw fallback. Slightly beyond the ideal 15, but not excessive for the scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the full lifecycle for ad plans, ad groups, and banners (list, create, update, status action, delete via action). It also includes statistics and a raw request for edge cases. Minor gaps like missing budget adjustment standalone or reporting endpoints are covered by raw_request, making the surface reasonably complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues