scaps-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to scaps-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables building wire-connected native schematics, visually checking them, editing values, and running native frequency/transient analyses plus symbolic formulas and plots, with results saved as CSV/PNG and openable in the separately installed application.29MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to drive local photonic simulation software through its Python API, supporting modeling and layout, property setup, simulation runs, parameter sweeps, job management, and result analysis.20Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA thin MCP server that wraps spicelib for circuit simulation. Exposes tools for running AC, transient, DC op, and parameter sweep analyses, enabling behavioral model fitting through iterative simulation and measurement comparison.48GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP bridge for Demeter/Artemis EXAFS fitting. Enables headless fits, building Artemis projects, generating LaTeX reports, and launching the Artemis GUI.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMaintained fork of Three-Little-Birds/openvsp-mcp, adding OpenVSP geometry inspection, typed parameter editing, SVG/STL previews, validated VSPAERO analysis, and durable parallel batches with progress, cancellation, resume, and CSV/JSON export. Independently maintained by rhyne1012; not an official OpenVSP or NASA project.18MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural-language-driven automation of Ansys Lumerical photonic simulations (FDTD, MODE, DEVICE, INTERCONNECT) with 40+ tools for geometry, materials, sources, monitors, solvers, results, optimization, and documentation.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct actions (create/edit/describe device, write data, import file, plot, sq_limit). The main overlap is among the simulation family — scaps_simulate, scaps_batch, scaps_optimize, scaps_run_script — but their descriptions draw usable boundaries (single run, parameter sweep, fitting, escape hatch). Minor potential confusion between scaps_results and scaps_plot, and between scaps_create_device and scaps_edit_device, is resolved by the descriptions.
All tools share the scaps_ prefix and mostly follow verb_noun (write_data, list_files, create_device, edit_device, describe_device, run_script, import_file). A few deviate to bare verbs or nouns (scaps_simulate, scaps_status, scaps_jobs, scaps_results, scaps_batch), but the pattern remains predictable and readable.
16 tools is at the upper end of the comfortable range, but the domain (device construction, simulation, batch/optimization, results, jobs, file management, scripting) genuinely warrants this surface. Each tool maps to a real workflow step rather than padding.
Coverage is strong: create/edit/describe devices, simulate, batch, optimize, retrieve/plot results, manage jobs, import files, query script reference, and a low-level script escape hatch. Gaps are minor — no explicit delete/cleanup of run artifacts and no dedicated material-authoring tool, though scaps_write_data and scaps_edit_device partially cover these.