Skip to main content
Glama
asgard-ai-platform

mcp-uof

by asgard-ai-platform
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-uof

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Maximo Server

      nick0918964388
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Wraps IBM Maximo API services as MCP tools, enabling AI applications like Dify Agent to manage assets, work orders, and inventory through natural language interactions with enterprise asset management systems.
      -

    • mcp2ws

      AustinWise
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes SOAP-based web services as MCP servers by parsing WSDL files. Enables AI assistants to interact with legacy SOAP/WS-\* web services through the Model Context Protocol.
      21
      4
      MIT

    • SOAP MCP Server

      mayankgupta7673
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes SOAP web services as Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, allowing AI models to interact with legacy SOAP services through automatic method discovery and type mapping.
      MIT

    • Company API MCP Server

      samerhasan
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes internal company services as LLM-callable MCP tools, enabling AI agents to perform business operations like customer management, order processing, and support ticketing through natural language.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Overlaps like get_form_structure vs get_form_structure_by_id are clarified by descriptions, and get_task_data vs get_task_result serve different detail levels. No ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'uof_custom_' prefix + verb_noun in snake_case (e.g., apply_form, check_auth, sign_next). The naming is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools cover the necessary operations for a form/approval system without being excessive. Each tool serves a logical need in the workflow, from listing forms to applying, querying, and managing tasks.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core form lifecycle (list, get structure, apply, preview, query, task details, termination). Minor gaps exist: no pending task list API (acknowledged limitation) and no file attachment support, but the essential operations are present.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources