Skip to main content
Glama
asgard-ai-platform

MCP Universal EC E-Invoice Server

void_b2c_invoice

Void a B2C invoice by submitting required details: invoice number, date, buyer/seller IDs, cancel date/time/reason. Returns API confirmation.

Instructions

Void (invalidate) a B2C invoice (C0501). Returns the API response.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
remarkNoRemark.
buyer_idYesBuyer identifier.
seller_idYesSeller identifier.
cancel_dateYesCancellation date (YYYYMMDD).
cancel_timeYesCancellation time (HHmmss).
invoice_dateYesOriginal invoice date (YYYYMMDD).
cancel_reasonYesCancellation reason.
invoice_numberYesInvoice number to void.
return_tax_document_numberNoReturn/tax document number.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present. The description only says 'Void (invalidate)' and 'Returns the API response', failing to disclose side effects, permission requirements, irreversibility, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise single sentence with a return note. Front-loaded and efficient, though slightly under-specified.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 9 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description omits details about return format, error conditions, and contextual usage among many siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline but not exceeding it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Void' and the resource 'B2C invoice (C0501)', distinguishing it from siblings like void_b2b_invoice and void_b2c_allowance. The document code adds specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use versus alternatives such as cancel_invoice or void_b2c_allowance. No prerequisites or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asgard-ai-platform/mcp-universalec-e-invoice'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server