Skip to main content
Glama
asgard-ai-platform

MCP Universal EC E-Invoice Server

by asgard-ai-platform
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Universal EC E-Invoice Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Elementary POS MCP

      pedrocastellanos
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to interact with a point-of-sale public API through 32 MCP tools for managing bills, customers, items, orders, receipts, stock, suppliers, taxes, and webhooks over stdio and HTTP transports.
      -

    • Taiwan Logistics MCP

      junter1989k-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create CVS store pickup and home delivery shipments in Taiwan, including label printing and tracking via the ECPay Logistics API.
      MIT

    • Ecount MCP Server

      unohee
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server wrapping ECOUNT ERP OpenAPI, enabling Claude to call inventory, sales, purchase, and accounting data as tools. Supports automating tax invoice journal entries and customer registration.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but pairs like create_b2c_allowance and create_b2c_allowance_named differ only in field format, and get_invoice_numbers vs expanded versions may confuse agents. Overall, the set is well-disambiguated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with clear prefixes (create, void, cancel, get) and type qualifiers (b2b, b2c, allowance, invoice). Suffixes like '_named' and '_expanded' are used systematically.

    Tool Count4/5

    27 tools is on the higher side, but the domain of e-invoice management requires many distinct operations for different transaction types, formats, and lifecycle stages. The count is justified given the comprehensive coverage.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers creation, void, cancel, and number management well, but lacks a general tool to retrieve invoice details (e.g., get_invoice). Missing update operations are handled via exchange tools, but the absence of a retrieval tool is a notable gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources