sandbox_exec

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions timing and on_timeout behavior but does not cover sandboxing, security, output handling, or error conditions. Critical behavioral traits are omitted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with no extraneous words. It front-loads the tool name and delivers specific guidance on timing parameters efficiently. However, it lacks an introductory sentence stating the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 10 parameters, no annotations, and an existing output schema, the description should cover core functionality, return values, and dependencies. It focuses narrowly on timing, leaving major gaps in overall behavior and usage context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning for timing-related parameters (expected_runtime_seconds, timeout_seconds, etc.) and explains on_timeout options. However, it does not explain cwd, command, env, network, or writable_roots. With 0% schema coverage, more comprehensive parameter explanation is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Kali Agent MCP tool: sandbox_exec' but does not explicitly state what the tool does with a verb+resource. It implies execution via 'explicit execution timing' but the core action is unclear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides guidance on when to use different on_timeout options (background vs synchronous) but does not explain when to choose sandbox_exec over sibling tools like exec_command or docker_exec. No alternative context is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.